Thus, there are various factors that are profoundly important to characterize the authentic features of global city, from economic powers ( economic stability, market attractiveness, vitality, environment and regulations), livability ( cost of living, public safety, employment opportunities and social welfare benefits), cultural interaction (diversity of cultural production, level of tolerance with cultural manifestation, volume of interaction, dining and shopping, and visitor attractions), and accessibility (integrated network of transportation within city, and international transportation infrastructure). The “denationalization” of urban space and the formation of new claims by transnational actors, subsequently raise the question: Whose city does it belong to? With the highly paid professional, Sassen (2005) introduce global cities as global, Global cities have since arisen not only as financial, centers but also a producers of services that are global, Global cities are; geopolitical power center, cultural and. But an analysis that emphasizes place suggests that the new global grid of strategic sites is a node for politics and interaction. Subsequently, this also brings an emphasis on questions of power and inequality. What is the difference between these two? Global city is considerably regarded a nexus for political and cultural alignment where incorporation of cities into new cross border signals the emergence of parallel political geography. It is one largely embedded in major cities insofar as these concentrate most immigrants, certainly in the developed world, whether in the United States, or Western Europe and other developed industrialized countries across continents. Build a city, evolve it into your dream city. Save your park from the destruction! And what about ‘world city’. People live in safe and clean environment. The loss of power at the national level produces the possibility for new forms of power and politics at the sub-national level. Match-3 in row & exciting levels await you! Cities that span from West to East, such as New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Zurich, Frankfurt, Chicago, Hong Kong, Sydney and etc, are categorized as global cities with different classification. An examination of globalization through the concept of the global city introduces a strong emphasis on strategic components of the global economy rather than the broader and more diffuse homogenizing dynamics we associate with the globalization of consumer markets. Global city Manhattan does generate that kind of wealth. Paris, Tokyo and Hong Kong followed respectively. Immigration, for instance, is one major process through which a new transnational political economy and translocal household strategies are being constituted. To acquire a rudimentary understanding of these issues will certainly require approaches that diverge from the more traditional studies of political elites, local party politics, neighborhood associations, immigrant communities, and so on through which the political landscape of cities and metropolitan regions has been conceptualized in urban studies. Although global cities play a central node in navigating courses of globalization, it is no wonder that given the sophisticated complication produced by global cities that global economy has grown the way it has. The term has its origins in research on cities carried out during the 1980s, which examined the common characteristics of the world’s most important cities. Cities are foremost in this new geography. What is a Global City? The global city and the network of these cities is a space that is both place-centered in that it is embedded in particular and strategic locations; and it is transterritorial because it connects sites that are not geographically proximate yet are intensely connected to each other. Saskia Sassen literally wrote the book on global cities back in 2001 (though her global cities work dates back well over a decade prior to that book). New York was ranked the best city for business activities, and human capital. Global cities are perceived by migrants and immigrants as melting pot of gold with opportunities for them to seek retribution and new settlement that would replenish their socially disadvantaged position and elevate their socioeconomic status and cultural privileges on the pursuit of seeking new sociocultural identities in fairly sophisticated global cities.